Skip to main content
· 11/5/1934

Stevens Mfg. Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 8 F. Supp. 720
  • 80 Ct. Cl. 183
  • 14 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1002
  • 4 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 1351
  • 1934 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the doctrine of equitable estoppel bars recovery where a claimant “acquiesced in the [underlying] transaction in such a manner as to change the relationship of the parties and make its repudiation of the proceedings contrary to equity and good conscience”
  • estoppel appropriate when contractor’s conduct changed relationship between the parties, and repudiation of agreement was contrary to equity and good conscience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Booth, Green, Littleton, Williams, Whaley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.