Steven Weissman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dawn Joy Fashions,inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, despite absence of “unique circumstances,” opposing party, by failing to oppose time extension, waived nonjurisdictional requirement that appellant renew its Rule 50 motion after trial
• holding that Thompson applies exclusively to timeliness of notices of appeal
• finding that claims of refusal to rehire or denials of employment were adverse actions for purposes of ADA retaliation claims
• noting that a defendant “cannot challenge the District Court’s summary judgment decision” because the court’s “judgment on the verdict after a full trial on the merits supersedes the earlier summary judgment proceedings”
• noting that the NYSHRL contains “anti-retaliation provisions substantially similar to the ADA’s provision”
• declining to decide appropriate standard for imposing punitive damages on claims brought under Administrative Code because parties agreed that federal standard should apply and jury was charged under the federal standard without objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).