Steven W. Hughes and Adrienne R. Hughes v. 21st Mortgage Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Guidelines phrase \another offense\ had two reasonable interpretations without consulting dictionary definitions of \another\ or \offense\
• concluding that a Guidelines provision was ambiguous based on two reasonable interpretations of the phrase at issue
• explaining that when the language of a Sentencing Guidelines provision is plain and unambiguous, it is presumed to manifest the Legislature’s intent, and we must give it effect
• endorsing consideration of \commission policy and official commission interpretation\ when interpreting an ambiguous provision of the sentencing guidelines
• \Our interpretation of Minn. Sent. Guidelines 2.F.2. is guided by the context of that section and the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines as a whole.\
• \We apply the rules of statutory construction to our interpretation of [Minnesota's] sentencing guidelines.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).