Steven Statharos, Theodore Statharos, Dorothy Statharos v. New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that those who choose to “enter the heavily regulated taxi industry” have a reduced “interest in confidentiality” in certain information related to their activities
• refusing to apply \fair ground for litigation\ standard to request to enjoin city agency from enforcing regulation promulgated pursuant to city charter
• “Because plaintiffs allege deprivation of a constitutional right, no separate showing of irreparable harm is necessary.”
• confidentiality interests are not absolute and “can be overcome by a sufficiently weighty government purpose”
• “[t]his confidentiality interest is not absolute . . . and can be overcome by a sufficiently weighty government purpose”
• “[T]his Court has recognized the existence of a constitutionally protected interest in the confidentiality of personal financial information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).