Steven Roy Harper v. Gary Grammer, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the first prong of (l)(d) was constitutionally applied to defendant in case where facts indicated that the murder was unnecessarily torturous to the victims
• finding that narrowing construction of section 29-2523(l)(d) to a murder that is “unnecessarily torturous to the victim satisfies the constitutional requirements”
• affirming the district court’s determination that the “ ‘unconstitutional vagueness of the second prong does not diminish the virility of the first prong’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).