Steven Olson v. Bemis Company, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding grievance settled through CBA process preempted by Section 301 and collecting cases for same
• stating “we strongly doubt that [equitable estoppel] is an independent cause of action under federal labor common law”
• affirming a district court’s decision to review documents attached to a motion to dismiss despite the plaintiff specifically objecting to their review because those documents are central to the complaint
• declining to apply in-circuit presumption at motion-to-dismiss stage even with settlement agreement in record
• applying this standard to a claim for breach of contract under Section 301
• “District courts may exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims that share a common nucleus of operative facts with a federal claim properly before the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).