Skip to main content
· 6/16/2000

Steven M. YATES, Claimant-Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Respondent-Appellee

Citations

  • 213 F.3d 1372
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14150
  • 2000 WL 776409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether the [Regional Office’s] failure to consider the Army regulations would constitute clear and unmistakable error as defined above is fact-based and hence beyond our jurisdiction.”
  • \We have jurisdiction over this appeal because it raises a challenge concerning the interpretation of the 'clear and unmistakable error' regulation that was relied on by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Michel, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.