Steven-Kyle Crews v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “because employees acting within the scope of their employment are agents of their employer, an employer and its employees are generally considered to be a single actor, rather than multiple conspirators”
• noting that “because employees acting within the scope of their employment are agents of their employer, an employer and its employees are generally considered to be a single actor, rather than multiple conspirators.”
• affirming application of intracorporate conspiracy doctrine to conspiracy claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985
• affirming application of intracorporate conspiracy doctrine to conspiracy claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985
• affirming application of intracorporate conspiracy doctrine in conspiracy claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985
• affirming application of intracorporate conspiracy doctrine in conspiracy claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).