Skip to main content
· 3/31/2016

Steven Hill v. City of Chicago

Citations

  • 817 F.3d 561
  • 32 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1179
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5867
  • 2016 WL 1257821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a]lthough the D.C. Circuit has yet to address this question, the Court finds the Fifth Circuit’s analysis in [Houston Funding] persuasive.”
  • applying McDonnell Douglas framework to case alleging a discriminatory failure to accommodate under the PDA
  • “Although the D.C. Circuit has yet to address this question, the Court finds the Fifth Circuit’s analysis in [Houston Funding] persuasive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Ripp, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.