· 3/31/2016
Steven Hill v. City of Chicago
Citations
- 817 F.3d 561
- 32 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1179
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 5867
- 2016 WL 1257821
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[a]lthough the D.C. Circuit has yet to address this question, the Court finds the Fifth Circuit’s analysis in [Houston Funding] persuasive.”
- applying McDonnell Douglas framework to case alleging a discriminatory failure to accommodate under the PDA
- “Although the D.C. Circuit has yet to address this question, the Court finds the Fifth Circuit’s analysis in [Houston Funding] persuasive.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Ripp, Peterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.