· 12/19/2023
Steven Harner v. Mercy Hospital Joplin
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing a defamatory statement in the same manner and stating that such a statement “can be the basis for a defamation claim”
- describing a defamatory statement in the same manner and finding that such a statement “can be the basis for a defamation claim”
- describing a defamatory statement in the same manner and finding that such a statement “can be the basis for a defamation claim”
- declin- ing request to align Oregon defamation law with approach taken by the Ninth Circuit
- declin- ing request to align Oregon defamation law with approach taken by the Ninth Circuit
- “[A]t summary judgment, the [court] must view the evidence in the light most favorable to [the nonmoving party], leaving it to the eventual factfinder to make credibility determinations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Russell, C.J., Powell and Fischer, JJ., concur; Wilson, J., dissents in separate opinion filed; Broniec, J., concurs in opinion of Wilson, J. Gooch, J., not participating.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.