Skip to main content
· 6/7/1996

Steven G. Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Noel P. Rahn, an Individual

Citations

  • 85 F.3d 1328
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13558
  • 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1458
  • 1996 WL 303440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial judge can grant summary judgment if evidence is insufficient for reasonable trier of fact to infer discrimination, even where factual dispute on pretext exists
  • holding that a trial judge can grant summary judgment if evidence is insufficient for reasonable trier of fact to infer discrimination, even where factual dispute on pretext exists
  • explaining that we apply this framework in both Title VII cases and in the ADEA context
  • reading Hicks to reject an approach under which a showing that the defendant's proffered explanation is false is presumptively insufficient to show discrimination
  • reading Hicks to reject an approach under which a showing that the defendant’s' proffered explanation is false is presumptively insufficient to show discrimination
  • reasoning that the court need not resolve other allegations presented by plaintiff, rather the court need only determine whether the evidence offered “creates a reasonable inference that age was a determinative factor” in the plaintiffs termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Loken, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.