Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of township inhabitants ... is plainly in the public interest.”
• “Protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of township inhabitants . . . is plainly in the public interest.”
• analyzing ordinance requiring connection to the municipal water system as a legislative act and affirming dismissal
• upholding mandatory water hookup ordinance as applied to plaintiffs against substantive due process challenge, stating that “regulating the water supply is a basic and legitimate governmental function”
• “The plaintiffs have not, so far as the record shows, sought compensation through state proceedings. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ takings claim must be rejected.”
• \A party cannot raise issues for the first time in a reply brief.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).