Skip to main content
· 6/2/1988

Steven A. Kurowski and David H. Nicholls v. James J. Krajewski, Individually and in His Capacity as Judge of the Lake County Court, Division III

Citations

  • 848 F.2d 767
  • 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 678
  • 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 899
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8133
  • 1988 WL 58995

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a public official may raise questions of immunity on appeal from a final judgment, even though he bypassed an opportunity to take an interlocutory appeal”
  • holding judge’s firing of public defenders because of their political beliefs was administrative act not protected by judicial immunity
  • approving district court’s allowance of 1.6 attorney hours for preparation of the fee petition
  • prevailing plaintiff’s counsel entitled to compensation for time spent pursuing fee request
  • “A judge both makes and implements governmental policy..., Holders of the appointing authority may ‘seek to ensure that judges agree with them on important jurisprudential questions.”
  • \That the lawyers spent some time in blind alleys is irrelevant; this is inevitable . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Coffey, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.