Skip to main content
· 2/5/2013

Steve Smith v. A. Hedgpeth

Citations

  • 706 F.3d 1099
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493
  • 2013 WL 425814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Apprendi did not clearly establish that a state court must \consider sentencing enhancements as an element of an offense for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause\
  • holding that Apprendi did not clearly establish that a state court must \consider sentencing enhancements as an element of an offense for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bybee, Farris, Ferdinand, Fernandez, Jay, Jerome

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.