Steubner Realty 19, Ltd. v. Cravens Road 88, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that express assertion of estoppel is sufficient to raise the affirmative defense of quasi-estoppel
• holding that express assertion of estoppel is sufficient to raise the affirmative defense of quasi-estoppel
• holding that a pleading of estoppel is sufficient to raise the defense of quasi-estoppel
• holding that a pleading of estoppel is sufficient to raise the defense of quasi-estoppel
• “[E]stoppel precludes a party, with knowledge of the facts, from taking a position inconsistent with his or her former position to the disadvantage or injury of another[.]” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).