Steuart Transportation Co. v. Ashe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the character of the [affected land] remains unchanged and the restrictions imposed on the beach area afford the same benefits to the lot owners today as they did when imposed by the [original beneficiaries 41 years ago]”
• refusing to set aside as clear error the factual findings of a chancellor on the question of whether there was mutual intent to restrict the uses of a certain plot of land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).