Stetson v. Healey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reviewing court must give due deference to fact finder’s findings and cannot substitute its own judgment for that of fact finder
• recognizing that the factfinder is the sole arbiter of the credibility of witnesses and the appellate court must give due deference to the factfinder
• holding that reviewing court must give due deference to fact finder’s findings and cannot substitute its own judgment for that of fact finder
• stating that “merely leaving a child with a non-incarcerated parent does not constitute the ability to provide care”
• holding that court of appeals erred in reversing termination on factual sufficiency grounds by focusing on one pertinent factor “[r]ather than weighing all of the evidence” and “not fully account[ing] for evidence that supported the jury’s verdict”
• holding that court of appeals erred in reversing termination on factual sufficiency grounds by focusing on one pertinent factor “[r]ather than weighing all of the evidence” and “not fully account[ing] for evidence that supported the jury’s verdict”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).