Skip to main content
· 7/29/1994

Stetka v. Hunt Real Estate Corp.

Citations

  • 859 F. Supp. 661
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12292
  • 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1311
  • 1994 WL 417027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining . 2 13 Any amount recovered on this basis could potentially be trebled under 26 M.R.S.A.§ 626-A (2000
  • finding real estate agent to be an independent contractor where no taxes were deducted from the plaintiffs gross commission payment and the plaintiff received a Form 1099
  • hired party was independent contractor where, inter alia, hiring party “did not exercise day-today control over [hired party] such as an employer would exercise over an employee”
  • hired party was independent contractor where hiring party “did not exercise day-to-day control over [hired party] such as an employer would exercise over an employee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foschio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.