Stern v. Weinstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the trial court “consulted depositions, affidavits, and other pertinent evidence” in addressing a factual challenge
• noting the district court “consulted depositions, affidavits, and other pertinent evidence” in analyzing the defendants’ 12(b)(1) motion which raised “a factual challenge to [the plaintiff’s] standing”
• analyzing standing with respect to plaintiff who asserted fiduciary duty claims
• “As the defendants had not answered and the parties had not engaged in discovery, the first motion to dismiss was facial.”
• “As the defendants had not answered and the parties had not engaged in discovery, the first motion to dismiss was facial.”
• “As the defendants had not answered and the parties had not engaged in discovery, the first motion to dismiss was facial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).