Stern v. Henley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The defendant cannot have it both ways, insisting on separate trials and attempting to dismiss the indictments against him for lack of speedy trial.”
• defendant’s constitutional right to speedy trial is not infringed where defendant asserts his rights to severance of trials and objects to State’s motions to consolidate charges for trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).