Stern v. FOUR FREEDOMS NAT. MED. SERVICES, CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the motion for continuance failed to describe the subject matter of the witness's testimony so the court could not determine whether the party's case would be prejudiced by the absence of such evidence
• \The granting or denying of a motion for continuance is within the discretion of the trial judge and a gross or flagrant abuse of this discretion must be demonstrated by the complaining party before this court will substitute its judgment for that of the trial judge.\
• \The granting or denying of a motion for continuance is within the discretion of the trial judge and a gross or flagrant abuse of this discretion must be demonstrated by the complaining party before this court will substitute its judgment for that of the trial judge.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).