Skip to main content
· 3/15/1914

Stern v. City of Columbus

Citations

  • 16 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 353

Syllabus

<p>Municipal Corporations — Application of the Marmet Case to Fees Imposed hy a Municipal Legislature — Vehicle License Ordinance Not a General Revenue Measure, When — Application of the Surplus Received for Licenses.</p> <p>1. In an action involving the validity of an ordinance, the defense of res adjudicata is not available where based on the claim that a former ordinance on the same subject was held constitutional, notwith-' standing the general similarity of the present ordinance to the old one is admitted.</p> <p>2. A vehicle license ordinance will not be classified as a general revenue measure, and therefore invalid, because of the fact that the receipts greatly exceed the expense of collection, where it appears that the surplus is turned into the fund for repair of the streets.</p>

Judges: Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.