Stern v. Beer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff must “support[]” his or her “jurisdictional averments by competent proof” when “they are questioned by the Court”
• “Unless . . . challenged, the jurisdictional question is determined by the allegations.”
• “if the first service of process is ineffective, a motion to dismiss should not be granted, but the case should be retained for proper service later.”
• “if the first service of process is ineffective, a motion to dismiss should not be granted, but the case should be retained for proper service later.”
• “if the first service of process is ineffective, a motion to dismiss should not be granted, but the case should be retained for proper service later”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).