Stern Produce Company, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral argument

• Argued

  33 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “double jeopardy protections do not bar retrial” when “[t]he government had no reason to introduce such evidence because, at the time of trial, under the law of our circuit, the government was not required to prove” that element
• holding that “double jeopardy protections do not bar retrial” when “[t]he government had no reason to introduce such evidence because, at the time of trial, under the law of our circuit, the government was not required to prove” that element
• applying issue preclusion because, in part, the issue was \vigorously litigated\ in the district court and it heard argument from both sides
• applying issue preclusion because, in part, the issue was “vigorously litigated” in the district court and it heard argument from both sides
• permitting retrial where the Supreme Court abrogated the Ninth Circuit’s mens rea requirement for relevant financial offenses after trial
• noting the importance of careful factfinder 18 review for collateral estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).