Sterling v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The court found that the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court’s finding, stating: ‘[a] person who is familiar with a substance may identify it. An expert may identify a controlled substance without chemical analysis.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Nance v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1991-04-11· cited 66×
• Burns v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-09-30· cited 39×
• People v. Stamps
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-09-30· cited 37×
• State v. Carter
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2008-04-09· cited 34×
• Jones v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2011-01-20· cited 33×
• Elizondo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-02-27· cited 27×
• State v. Herndon
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-10-02· cited 16×
• People v. Mooring
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-09-27· cited 15×
• State v. Charlton
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-02-11· cited 13×
• State v. Evans
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1992-01-15· cited 13×
• Amberson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2018-05-03· cited 6×
• Wallace v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-02-15· cited 4×
• Pettigrew v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1999-05-28· cited 3×
• State v. Heath
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-08-11· cited 3×
• Kenneth Gilmore v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2014-09-02
• Gerald Wayne Jones v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-08-25
• State v. Mario Wade
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-12-02
• Miller, Brenda Ann v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2003-03-06
• Sherman Dale Anderson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-08-13
• Victor Borchick v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2009-07-29