Sterling v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Appellant may cross-examine the alleged victim at the trial about events which may be relevant to his defense. It is possible that matters previously ruled inadmissible could become relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marion v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1979-12-10· cited 41×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-02-04· cited 30×
• Gaines v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-06-28· cited 28×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-05-16· cited 15×
• McCoy v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-10-07· cited 15×
• Joyner v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2009-04-02· cited 14×
• State v. Sheard
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-02-07· cited 9×
• Overton v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-06-19· cited 6×
• Timothy Justin Joyner v. State of Arkansas
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2021-04-15· cited 5×
• Bradley v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-01-13· cited 3×
• Thacker v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-11-05· cited 2×
• Boreck v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-03-23· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Duncan v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-04-17· cited 34×