Sterling v. P & H Mining Equipment, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff “failed to adduce evidence sufficient to support an inference that [the plaintiff] inhaled asbestos from component parts of P & H cranes” rendering summary judgment appropriate
• holding that the plaintiff “failed to adduce evidence sufficient to support an inference that [the plaintiff] inhaled asbestos from component parts of P & H cranes” rendering summary judgment appropriate
• observing that “[t]he cited testimony of other Bethlehem Steel employees in other cases did nothing to show [Appellant] Mr. Sterling inhaled dust from component parts of P & H cranes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).