Sterling v. Fischer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing claim where “[the] [p]laintiff s allegations of malice, in an effort to overcome the common-interest privilege, amount to little more than mere surmise and conjecture” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “It is well established that only a stranger to a contract, such as a third party, can be liable for tortious interference with a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).