Sterling Smokeless Coal Company v. Tammy Akers Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in determining whether substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision, the court also must consider whether the ALJ analyzed all of the relevant evidence and whether the ALJ sufficiently explained her findings and her rationale in crediting evidence
• discussing that a court’s review focuses on whether the ALJ analyzed the relevant evidence and sufficiently explained his findings and rationale in crediting the evidence
• discussing that a court’s review focuses on whether the ALJ analyzed the relevant evidence and sufficiently explained his findings and rationale in crediting the evidence
• discussing that a court’s review focuses on whether the ALJ analyzed the relevant evidence and sufficiently explained his findings and rationale eredinne the evidence
• discussing that a court’s review focuses on whether the ALJ analyzed the relevant evidence and sufficiently explained his findings and rationale in crediting the evidence
• discussing that a court’s review focuses on whether the ALJ analyzed the relevant evidence and sufficiently explained his findings and rationale in crediting the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).