Sterling Savings Bank v. Citadel Development Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that 3 4 property worth $1.05 million for a debt of over $1.9 million sufficiently establishes property value 5 factor
• finding that property worth 9 $1.05 million for a debt of over $1.9 million sufficiently establishes property value factor
• noting that “a party does not have a substantive right to a receiver”
• finding that such a provision “commands great weight” in the final decision
• noting “the grant of managerial powers . . . effectively divests the property owner of rights traditionally exercised by an owner”
• requiring an analysis of the Ninth Circuit’s LaPeter’s receivership factors but acknowledging that consent is “a 21 factor that commands great weight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).