Sterling Federal Systems, Inc. v. Daniel S. Goldin, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ erred in not considering obesity in sequential 17 analysis when obesity “was a condition that could exacerbate her reported illness”
• noting that the agency abuses its discretion when its decision is “clearly unreasonable, arbitrary, or fanciful”
• noting that a clear error of judgment occurs when an action is “arbitrary, fanciful, or clearly unreasonable”
• observing that, “[i]n general, courts hold that the 17 imposition of a fine . . . is merely a collateral consequence of conviction, and does 18 not meet the ‘in custody’ requirement”
• noting the agency abuses its discretion when its decision is “clearly unreasonable, arbitrary, or fanciful”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).