Sterling Factors, Inc. v. Whelan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that finding necessary to support judgment for fraud under Georgia law was equivalent to finding necessary to support exclusion from discharge under § 523(a)(2)
• single opinion issued in Sterling Factors v. Schaner, 1:99-cv-1961, and Sterling Factors v. Whelan, 1:99-cv-1962
• “While the availability of collateral estoppel in a particular case is a question of law, the decision to apply the doctrine is vested in the trial court's discretion.”
• affirming as to § 523(a)(4) and § 523(a)(6) claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).