Skip to main content
· 1/19/1951

Sterling Electric Co. v. Kent

Citations

  • 233 Minn. 31
  • 45 N.W.2d 709
  • 1951 Minn. LEXIS 613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that filing a lien statement “is not the commencement of an action or proceeding to enforce the lien”
  • where the meaning of a revised statute is free from ambiguity, prior law cannot be resorted to for purpose of creating an ambiguity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christianson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.