Sterling Discount Corp. v. Hooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary judgment should have been granted to defendants on all claims where plaintiffs idea was both “lacking in novelty” and “had been utilized by the defendants ... prior to its submission”
• “[l]ack of novelty in an idea is fatal to any cause of action for its unlawful use”
• \[l]ack of novelty in an idea is fatal to any cause of action for its unlawful use\
• “Lack of novelty in an idea is fatal to any cause of action for its unlawful use.”
• Lack of novelty in an idea is fatal to any cause of action for its unlawful use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).