Steptoe v. Beverly Area Planning Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs did not have a property right under 42 U.S.C. § 1982 to receive comprehensive housing information from a voluntary, noncommercial organization
• housing center “in no way could have impaired ... property interests” because homeseekers could obtain any “necessary housing information from traditional commercial channels.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).