Steppe v. Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This Court concludes that the language of the provision, as well as the legislative history and policy considerations, warrants the more expanded view. The more expanded approach to § 523(a)(19)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).