Skip to main content
· 4/5/1954

Stepp v. United States

Citations

  • 347 U.S. 933
  • 74 S. Ct. 627
  • 98 L. Ed. 1084
  • 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “we find no inequity in the conclusion that collateral estoppel operates to bar relitigation of issues that were decided in the state suit and are controlling in this one”
  • “[T]he central inquiry is whether the same question raised in a subsequent suit was actually litigated and decided in the prior suit, which turns on the determi- nation whether the issue was properly placed in dispute and was resolved by the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.