· 4/5/1954
Stepp v. United States
Citations
- 347 U.S. 933
- 74 S. Ct. 627
- 98 L. Ed. 1084
- 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “we find no inequity in the conclusion that collateral estoppel operates to bar relitigation of issues that were decided in the state suit and are controlling in this one”
- “[T]he central inquiry is whether the same question raised in a subsequent suit was actually litigated and decided in the prior suit, which turns on the determi- nation whether the issue was properly placed in dispute and was resolved by the trier of fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.