Skip to main content
· 2/17/2005

Stepheny v. Brooklyn Hebrew School for Special Children

Citations

  • 356 F. Supp. 2d 248
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5342
  • 2005 WL 387675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding utterance of “ ‘white bitch’ ” or some variation thereof five times over a five-month period was not severe
  • “If the jilted lover seeks retribution through actions that are not gender- or race-based, Title VII is not implicated. If the conduct is gender- or race-based, it is.”
  • “If the jilted lover seeks retribution through actions that are not gender- or race-based, Title VII is not implicated. If the conduct is gender- or race-based, it is.”
  • “Defendant has submitted indisputable evidence that it terminated [plaintiff] because she participated in [a] fight in the School’s parking lot . . . .”
  • “[T]he Supreme Court has held that Title VII prohibits racial discrimination against whites on the same terms as racial discrimination against non-whites.”
  • co- worker’s “utterance of ‘white bitch’ or some variation thereof to [plaintiff] five times over an approximately five-month period” was insufficient to support claim for hostile work environment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.