Skip to main content
· 11/12/1981

Stephenson v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 428 N.E.2d 190
  • 101 Ill. App. 3d 380
  • 56 Ill. Dec. 871
  • 1981 Ill. App. LEXIS 3519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • found defendant forfeited an instructions issue where 13 defendant did not object to instruction until the posttrial motion
  • “[A] party cannot allow the jury to receive an instruction without specific objection and then for the first time in a post-trial motion or an appeal claim that error was committed.”
  • “[A] party cannot allow the jury to receive an instruction without specific objection and then for the first time in a post-trial motion or an appeal claim that error was committed.”
  • if a party has had an opportunity to object to any proposed instruction before its submission to the jury, it “cannot allow the jury to receive an instruction without specific objection and then for the first time in a post-trial motion or an appeal claim that error was committed”
  • if a party has had an opportunity to object to any proposed instruction before its submission to the jury, it \cannot allow the jury to receive an instruction without specific objection and then for the first time in a post-trial motion or an appeal claim that error was committed\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.