Stephens v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• there is no separate good will where the earnings of a sole practitioner depend on his individual skill and experience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beasley v. Beasley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-20· cited 59×
• Charriere v. Charriere
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1999-10-07· cited 17×
• MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Tarrant County Appraisal District
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-01-22· cited 13×
• Hirsch v. Hirsch
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1989-05-10· cited 13×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nail v. Nail
  Texas Supreme Court· 1972-11-08· cited 101×
• Coote v. Coote
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-06· cited 5×