Skip to main content

Stephens v. State

Citations

  • 816 S.E.2d 748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the denial of a motion to suppress under the independent source doctrine because “even assuming that the initial downloading was an unconstitutional search, the information subject to the motion to suppress was obtained through the execution of a valid search warrant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.