Stephens v. Peake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that “admissibility of former testimony is not precluded because, after the giving of that testimony, material information is obtained as to which the defense had no opportunity to cross-examine the absent witness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).