Skip to main content
· 10/24/1988

Stephens v. Oates

Citations

  • 374 S.E.2d 821
  • 189 Ga. App. 6
  • 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 1278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting appellant’s “contention that because [the general master] had the sole right to discharge her from its employ, the third prong of the test was not satisfied”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sognier, Appeal, Deen, Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.