Stephens v. County of Albemarle, VA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, although plaintiff showed the speaker was “willing,” plaintiff failed to show the speaker was willing to speak to plaintiff about the desired information
• acknowledging that a “willing speaker” exists, for purposes of a plaintiff’s constitutional standing, when one party to a settlement agreement with the government would be willing to speak to the plaintiff if not for a prohibition in the settlement agreement
• acknowledging that a \willing speaker\ exists, for purposes of a plaintiff's constitutional standing, when one party to a settlement agreement with the government would be willing to speak to the plaintiff if not for a prohibition in the settlement agreement
• “To be sure, it is now well established that the Constitution protects the right to receive information and ideas from a willing speaker.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).