· 4/12/2017
Stephens v. Cannon
Citations
- 234 So. 3d 687
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the parol evidence rule could not be used to exclude extraneous evidence regarding a written contract between a builder and a property owner
- holding that the parol evidence rule could not be used to exclude extraneous evidence regarding a written contract between a builder and a property owner
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.