Stephens v. Bashas' Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a landowner owes a duty to business invitees to provide safe ingress and egress from his property
• holding that duty was based on landowner-invitee relationship, and the fact plaintiff was injured outside defendant's premises was relevant to breach/standard of care, not duty
• explaining that the existence of a duty must be determined “on the basis of the parties’ relationship, not on the details of their conduct”
• warehouse had duty to provide parking to delivery truck driver injured after parking on public street; safe means of ingress and egress required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).