Stephen W. Brown Radiology Associates v. Gowers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that doctor could testify as to his own habit or custom but others could not
• rejecting a claim of error as to an offer of proof where the appellant had failed to show harm; “it is a well settled rule that a complaining party must show what he expects to prove and that such evidence is material, relevant, and beneficial to him”
• statute tolled because patient could not have learned of negligent radiation treatment during recovery period from side effects
• “The statute begins to run from the time the patient has knowledge, or through the exercise of ordinary care could have learned of the existence of the tort to him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).