Stephen S. Marozsan v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding—by the district court judge—that the magistrate judge was not disqualified under either 28 U.S.C. § 144 or § 455
• finding \no reason for disqualification\ when plaintiff's only evidence in support was \that both the judge and magistrate judge ruled against him on several issues\
• “judicial rulings alone almost never constitute valid basis for a bias or partial- ity motion”
• the mere fact that the judge ruled against a litigant on several issues held to be insufficient to show impermissible prejudice
• “judicial rulings alone almost never constitute valid basis for a bias or partiality motion”
• “[J]udicial rulings alone almost never constitute valid basis for a bias or partiality motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).