Stephen Rindley, D.D.S. v. Thomas Gallagher, Marshall Brothers, D.D.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the constitutional issues raised in three of plaintiff's claims pertaining to selective enforcement did not implicate the constitutionality of the statute
• reversing district court’s decision to dismiss a complaint based on Burford even though the federal court was in a position to declare a state regulatory procedure unconstitutional
• “In the Eleventh Circuit, a district court’s decision to abstain will only be reversed upon a showing of abuse of discretion.”
• courts of appeals review district courts’ decisions to abstain for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).