Skip to main content
· 4/4/1995

Stephen Ralls, Esq., Witness-Appellant v. United States

Citations

  • 52 F.3d 223
  • 41 Fed. R. Serv. 1248
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 4204
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2446
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7499
  • 1995 WL 142390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he attorney-client relationship does not exist where the attorney acts as a mere conduit for the transfer of money.”
  • “Generally, the attorney-client privilege does not safeguard against the disclosure of either the identity of the fee-payer or the fee arrangement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldisert, Choy, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.